WEKO3
アイテム
“Hegel’s‘ Rational’ as a Philosophical Key to resolve the Ethnic Antagonism between Korea and Japan, and the East Asian Cooperative Theory as a Historically Conceived Rational Project” - The problems about buildings the‘ modern nation-subjectivities’ in both Korea and Japan which have a conflict between the two (the third part)-
https://doi.org/10.19001/0002000218
https://doi.org/10.19001/000200021855feee77-6c0b-4713-aa03-5eb7d8ec6fce
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2026-04-01 | |||||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||||
| タイトル | 한일 간의 민족 대립 문제를 풀 실마리로서의 헤겔의 ‘이성적인 것’,및 실제로 기획된 ‘이성적인 것’으로서의 ‘동아협동체론’̶ 한일 양국에 있어 서로 엇갈리는 ‘근대 국민주체 세우기’에 관한 문제(제 삼편) ̶ | |||||||||||||||
| 言語 | ko | |||||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||||
| タイトル | “Hegel’s‘ Rational’ as a Philosophical Key to resolve the Ethnic Antagonism between Korea and Japan, and the East Asian Cooperative Theory as a Historically Conceived Rational Project” - The problems about buildings the‘ modern nation-subjectivities’ in both Korea and Japan which have a conflict between the two (the third part)- | |||||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||||||
| 言語 | kor | |||||||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||||||
| 主題 | a correlation between the Korean colonial modernization and the appearance of nationalism | |||||||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||||||
| 主題 | theory of ‘understanding-based state.’ or‘ rational’ | |||||||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||||||
| 主題 | “ Philosophy of low” | |||||||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||||||
| 主題 | the concept of the‘ East Asian Cooperative,’ | |||||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.19001/0002000218 | |||||||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||||||
| 著者 |
野中, 洋志
× 野中, 洋志
|
|||||||||||||||
| Abstract | ||||||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper aims to identify a potential framework for addressing the problem of ethnic antagonism rooted in differing interpretations of modern history between Korea and Japan, employing a literature-based analytical approach. To this end, this paper first examines Hegel’s discussion of the ‘rational state’ in Philosophy of Right . In doing so, it seeks to clarify the theoretical status of the ‘rational state’ as a framework capable of addressing interethnic antagonism-an issue that proves difficult to resolve at the level of the ‘understanding-based state.’ The paper then critically examines the concept of the ‘East Asian Cooperative,’ a regional sphere that imperial Japan sought to realize in the 1930s as a concrete solution to the so-called‘ ethnic problem,’ analyzing it from the perspective of whether it can be understood as a‘ rational’ space. | |||||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 千葉経済大学短期大学部研究紀要 en : Bulletin of Chiba Keizai College 号 22, p. 23-34, 発行日 2026-03-31 |
|||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 千葉経大学短期大学部 | |||||||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2189034X | |||||||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12694310 | |||||||||||||||